INTERVIEW_JOEL ZITO

The author of the award-winning documentary film “A
negação do Brasil” (The denial of Brazil), which
deals with prejudice, taboos, and the path of Afro-descendant characters
in Brazilian soap operas, film maker Joel Zito Araújo is now
releasing his first fiction feature film, “Filhas do vento”
(Daughters of the wind). The movie gathers up the largest Afro-descendant
cast ever in Brazilian cinema, and depicts an universal and dramatic
situation, based on the conflicts between different generations of a
family.
By Helio Hara
Were you surprised that your film won so many awards? (best film
by popular jury at Tiradentes Festival and eight Kikitos at Gramado
Festival)
I knew the film had its qualities and that one or more of the actors
would be awarded, but I didn’t expect so many. The awards testify
to the quality of the feature film and puts an end to the idea that
it is a film exclusively for Black audiences. I was sure the country
would be moved by a story which portrays universal conflicts, a lyrical
story, humane, among mothers, sisters and daughters. Those who go to
the movies wish to be affected with emotion. Another surprising element
is the fact that the Black actors escaped the stereotypes usually reserved
for them in the Brazilian cinema and TV. In “Filhas de vento”
they are just normal Brazilians.
Does the film contain autobiographic elements?
I was born in the municipality of Nanuque, in a small village similar
to that portrayed in the movie (Lavras Novas, district of Ouro Preto,
which in the 18th century was founded as a “quilombo” –
a runaway slave hideout). Actors Milton Gonçalves and Ruth de
Souza are also from Minas Gerais. When I made my previous feature film,
the documentary “A negação do Brasil” (on
the trajectory of the actors and the prejudice against Black characters
in TV soap operas), I heard many interesting stories. “Filhas
do vento” brings together a few of these stories. My female characters
all come from the stories I heard from the actresses and women in my
family.
It is a film with strong women and few men...
It is a movie about women, but the situation of the Brazilian Black
male is well portrayed. The character played by Milton Gonçalves
(who makes a living fixing bicycles) is a typical Black father concerned
about his acceptance by society, he wants to be perfect, has rigid morals
to show that he doesn’t correspond to the stereotyped idea about
Blacks. Zózimo Bulbul (who plays a man in love, without a steady
job) is an ordinary type that remains since the end of slavery: the
Black man excluded from the job market, who has problems with alcohol
and a unenthusiastic outlook on life.
In
the film, the word “fate” appears frequently. Is it the
idea to question the inevitable?
I wanted to show the attitude which still exists in a part of the Black
population, that portion most victimized by our history whose self-esteem
is very low. These people tend to justify their human condition as a
fatality, and not as the result of social-economical relations. The
character Cida (who migrates to the big city and fulfills her dream
of becoming an actress) breaks through this line of thought and makes
her dream come true.
The lover who unbalances one of the characters is a white man with
light-colored eyes...
He is almost like a character in a documentary, super-realistic,
the married lover, of either white or Black women. In real life, he
could be any color. In the movie, he had to be White, as there is a
physiological sense of punishment: the daughter wants to punish her
mother, who personifies a middle-class Black woman, who dedicates all
her energy to her professional life, forgetting her daughter, and is,
at the same, time a militant, understanding and discussing racial issues.
Does it make a lot of difference if stories about Blacks are told
by Blacks or Whites?
Black film making is going through a very particular moment of transition.
Our phychologicall and cultural universe is different, and cannot be
understood by White folks. By Black film making, I don’t mean
films with a majority of Blacks (in the cast, or in the production),
but cinema in which the authorship contains a black diasporic posture.
In “Assalto ao trem pagador” (Roberto Farias, 1962), we
get an outsider’s view (of a White director telling the story
of a Black character, Tião Medonho). On the other hand, Nelson
Pereira dos Santos, the director of “Rio 40 graus”, who
is a low middle-class man and son of tailors, got to know Blacks from
his very early childhood and is therefore able to understand and incorporate
them into his films in a different way thanks to the environment of
the neighborhoods, Brás and Bexiga in São Paulo, where
he was raised.
In the United States, art produced by Afro-Americans is studied in
a different category. In Brazil, is it relevant to think of “black
cultural producers”?
Brazil is headed towards a multi-racial future. The 1930-40’s
in Brazil were characterized by ideas of a mixture of all races. This
is something that differentiates Brazil. This idea started to be questioned.
I am not against miscegenation, I am a product of it and I’m not
suicidal! But the difference is that today, the idea of hybridization
is that of, instead of erasing the past, emphasizing the origins of
each element, value the past together with the present. “Filhas
do vento” was influenced by Spike Lee and other Black American
film makers and also by Almodóvar, Fellini and Bergman. It is
hybridization without erasing racial/ethnic characteristics. In Brazil,
black discourse regards integrationby way of a democratic living based
on the idea of multi-racialism, not an apartheid discourse, like in
many sectors and races in the United States.
Is it important that Government stimulates black cinema?
I think so, as in Brazil, society is ambiguous, liberal on one hand
and conservative on the other. No rightwing politician likes to be called
rightwing, nobody admits to be racist. We need to go through a phase
in which Government facilitates access of blacks, natives and other
minotity ethnic groups to the right of having public resources for artistic
productions, like the right to seats in universities. It would be something
transitory, I don’t know for how long.
Is the organization of Black film makers something important in Brazil,
a country where TV and commercial productions are marked by White people,
with blond hair and light-colored eyes?
This is a completely Nordic standard. You see in magazines the list
of the 50 best-looking soap opera actors, and at the top are the light-colored.
The more Nordic, the better-looking! We have to understand that beauty
or ugliness are not attributes of any specific race. We have to break
with this racist aesthetic idea that whites are superior to Blacks.
As to the Black film makers’, yes, I do think that it is important.
We have to be together to demarcate and protect a territory. Like the
gay and women film makers, who have to create associations to protect
their interests and be able to execute their ideas, creations.
Did the popularization of new technologies make film making more
democratic, providing access to further Black directors?
There was no direct effect. New technologies allow new film makers to
experiment until they are able to make their first feature film. Today,
there are 18 new Black film makers in Brazil who have already made their
short films and will possibly emerge as major names. In the so called
“retrieval of the Brazilian cinema” (starting in the mid
90’s, when production and box office revenues grew for local movies),
we saw 200 new names of directors who had made at least one feature
film. I am the only one claiming to be Afro-Brazilian among them all.
This is typical of the problems we are facing.
You are then, an optimist?
Yes, exaggeratedly so, to a fault! I think that everything is going
to get a lot better. If you think about Brazilian society starting in
the 70’s, you will see that, despite the snail’s pace, there
has been improvement and, today, the panorama is different. At that
time, notable athletes hid their black roots, intellectuals, artists,
Brazilian leftwing members, believed and loved the myth that we lived
in a racial democracy. Today, there are Black politicians, ministers,
activists in NGOs, hip hop musicians, extremely active, working to create
different country. And there is a new generation of white people with
different views as well. The ideas of racial relations we defend, they
are now a historical demand, from the last century, which have become
more powerful over the last twenty years. My films are a part of this
movement, they are a result of this social base.